Friday, 24 July 2015

Why Barrack Obama Should BE Regarded As The Most Incompetent President America Has Ever Had



Why Barrack Obama Should BE Regarded As The Most Incompetent President America Has Ever Had
  •  He is leaving The World Worse Than It Was Before He Emerged President 



When the USA slapped sanctions and severed ties with Cuba in the 1960s, the then Cuban president Fidel Castro is widely quoted to have said that ‘’the Americans will come back and talk to us when that country gets a black president and the world gets a pope from a Latin American country’’
Now 50 years down the road Castro’s prophetic phrase came to pass as an African in the names of Hussein barrack Obama managed, against all odds, to emerge as the president of the United States of America not once but twice, while a pope from Argentina, a Latin American country, indeed emerged at the helm of the Vatican.
And Castro was accurate in his historic prediction as the American government has restored ties with Cuba for the first time in over 50 years.
Of course you need to credit Obama for having overseen the normalization of the ever-frosty America-Cuba relations.
THE TURN DOWN
But it’s also worth noting that he has not lived to the hype that greeted him when he emerged as the first Black-man to rule the world’s super power in 2008.
Obama’s ascendency to the helm of the world’s super power nation was particularly greeted with a lot of enthusiasm around the world and everyone who is everyone expected a resurgent renewal to global politics in terms of issues concerning governance, socio economic and political aspects of the globe.
The black Africans were particularly overjoyed that one of their own had come to end the open persecution that they suffered in their country starting with slavery and the oppressive and racist Jim Crow laws that oppressed the black Afro-Americans.
Today the black Afro-Americans are still suffering worse than it was before Obama emerged president. Just the other day a video went viral of a white policeman harshly forcing a black woman out of her car. She was detained for an unknown offense and she later died in prison. This incident took place just one week ago.
The Fergusson incident where a white policeman shot an innocent black American sparking a wave of widespread demonstrations is also as recent as six months ago.
And all this takes as Obama issues no new guidelines to save members of his race from open persecution. Get me right am not saying that Obama was elected to exclusively fight for the rights of the black Americans. I also know that he was elected by both whites and blacks across America.
What am saying is that he has failed to resolves issues that had been resolved by his predecessors.
For instance Abraham Lincoln managed to end slavery even when he was white. Why has Obama failed to deal with racism in America?

Today The World Has More Conflicts
Before he assumed power, there was widespread expectations that the world would get better with fewer wars than the ones that were fanned by president George Bush Junior. But look what has happened to the world during his reign?
 He promised never to take America to war without the consent of the congress but he sent drones to Afghanistan without anybody’s permission and they killed many innocent Afghans. He promised to close Guantanamo bay but it’s still operating as ruthlessly as ever.
He promised to resurrect the American economy which had suffered due to the costly war in Iraq, but the economy plunged into an immediate credit crunch during his reign.
Yes it’s true that he found America at war in Iraqi and promised to redeem its image, but he is leaving a devastated and war tone Iraq governed by ISIS, a radical group that has even beheaded American citizens without facing any consequences.  
With one and half years to go on his second term, Obama is leaving the world worse off than he found it, with America losing grip as a super power to emerging global forces like china.
Obama Betrayed Africa
As I penned this article, American president Barrack Obama was about to touch down in the Kenyan capital Nairobi to attend the global entrepreneurship conference.
The widely pronounced visit has, however, not generated as much enthusiasm as the one that greeted his ascent to power some eight years ago.
Being an African born president has instead worked against the Africans as Obama has made sure that he distances himself from Africa as much as possible.
He found productive initiatives that had been started by his predecessors like AGOA, but he has spent two terms in office without mentioning a word about it.
I read a post by an American lady called Rose Whittaker sounding optimistic that the AGOA initiative was about to be renewed.
But look here, the AGOA initiative was hatched in 1996 and signed into action in 2000 to provide Africans with a tariff free access to the American market.
It worked well under presidents Bill Clinton and George Bush but why did it suffer a glaring setback during the reign of an African born president Obama?
 Was this because Obama was struggling to prove that he was not elected to serve the interests of his mother continent?
Even his belated visit to Kenya is out of shame rather than out of total conviction.
He had told Kenyans not to vote for president Uhuuru Kenyatta because if the ICC indictment. Why has he changed his mind?
He found Africa in peace and has left it in tatters. For instance when the Arab spring broke up in the north Africa he made one of the biggest blunders of his time in the white house in regard to African policy when he agitated for anarchy rather than dialogue.
\how did he do that?
When the Egyptians assembled at Tahiirir square to demonstrate against the then president Hosni Mubarak, there was a chance for a peaceful transition because Mubarak’s term was due to end in September, six months after the revolts took place in February.
 Mubarak had indeed promised that he would not seek for another term but would handover peacefully to another leader. But Obama walked to the podium and told Mubarak to step down. What followed was the chaotic spell that destabilized Egypt.
And when it came to Libya, the late Col Muamar Ghadafi had offered to talk peace, but Obama, under the cover of NATO sent war planes that bombed Libya to rabbles.
Ghadafi was later killed in a very gruesome manner even when the African union had offered to mediate on behalf of the Libyan leader.
Today Obama who refused to listen to the African union at that time is bragging about being the first American president to meet the African union.
Today there are conflicts in south Sudan, Central African Republic, Libya, and Burundi while Zimbabwe is in downward spiral, and Obama has got no opinion about them.
 
No Single Personal Initiative
At a small scale level we have seen American presidents sponsor and get involved in schemes to redeem the developing world. They initiated schemes like the millennium goals under the auspices of the \UN.
But Obama has spent two terms without mentioning anything to do with the MDGS.
His predecessors like Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and George Bush all have foundations in African countries to help the poor get access to health and education but Obama has none!
Even the schools which were started under his name like Senator Barrack Obama Secondary School in Kogelo , western Kenya has been neglected to an extent that the children of that school have no shoes and suffer from jiggers!.
It’s obvious that Barrack Obama is the most incompetent American president the USA has ever had.
He lacks a sense of perspective and managed to con the world with his oratory skills. He qualifies more as an emcee than a president.
I rest my case with the hope that you, the reader who has read this far, internalizes these facts as objective issues raised to let you understand the reign of our incompetent brother.
Ends 

The author Fred Daka Kamwada-Kamwada is a Ugandan journalist, social critic and a blogger; you can reach him on kamwadafred@yahoo.com
  

Saturday, 4 July 2015

Rtd Col Kiiza Besigye Suffers From a liberation syndrome and should Leave The Leadership Mantle To Rtd Maj Gen Mugisha Muntu



Rtd Col Kiiza Besigye Suffers From a liberation syndrome and should Leave The Leadership Mantle To Rtd Maj Gen Mugisha Muntu
·         Besigye has Failed to Graduate From A Ranting Politician With A Message Of Retribution To A Statesman With Progressive Policy Alternatives
·         His Obsession with the Kenyatta-Mandela Brand of Politics of Provoking Police to Unleash Tear Gas and Imprisonment Is Outdated
·         Besigye Has Been Thriving On A Rented Support Base

Early this week Retired Col Kiiza Besigye picked the nomination forms expressing his desire to contest for the FDC presidency which is a precursor to the biggest job in the land, the Ugandan presidency, for the fourth consecutive time.
While it’s clearly his constitutional right to contest as many times as he wants, he still has to make a reflection about the brand of politics he has been employing since 2001 when he was forced into the political fray by circumstances of the time in 2001.
It must be stressed that Besigye has had a very difficult time in convincing the electorate to vote for him because of the brand of politics he has been championing.
When he first came onto the political scene some 15 years ago he caused quite a stir in the country because of the desire that people had for an alternative leadership.
But he then bungled up his project by unleashing a revenge-laden campaign that intended to overturn everything. His campaign slogan was ‘agende’ (president Museveni has to go by all means), while his campaign symbol was a sledge hammer, which he purportedly introduced to convince Ugandans that he would use to uproot president Museveni.
By doing this, he made a fundamental mistake of basing the foundation of his presidency on anger with the intention of purging rather than improving the existing government which consisted many of his bush war colleagues.
Rented Support
Although he commanded some support in some parts of the country, it was clear that he was thriving on rented support. What do I mean by rented support?
By rented support I mean those Ugandans who had either got tired of president Museveni or had never had any liking for Museveni before. Rented support is temporary because it’s not usually based on issues but mostly on emotion and ulterior motives.
Besigye therefore scored considerable support in all the parts of the country that were inhabited by a large section of Ugandans who harbored anti-Museveni sentiments.
And the voting trends indeed showed that Besigye scored highly in parts of the country which were already waging war against president Museveni like northern Uganda that already had an anti-Museveni civil war led by Joseph Kony and parts of eastern Ugandan like Teso which had also resisted in the late 1980s.  
The point am laboring here is that  Besigye never marshaled any political support of his own because he was riding on an already made anti-Museveni section of the country in northern and eastern Uganda and parts of central Uganda.
In fact, Besigye got support in areas which former presidential aspirant DP leader Mr. Paul Kawanga Semogerere had enjoyed massive support during the 1996 presidential elections.
If you look into the records of the 1996 presidential elections you will realize that Kawanga Semogerere defeated president Museveni in most parts of northern and eastern Uganda and many urban areas including Kampala.
These are the areas which Besigye came and dominated in the subsequent elections of 2001, 2006 and 2011.
And I think it’s fair to regard that support as rented support because it was always there for the taking for whichever opposition candidate who stood to oppose Museveni.
Besigye’s Los Of Support
However we need to realize that during the course of the years, Besigye started losing the rented support he had enjoyed in the past.
Why did he start losing that support?
It was because Besigye failed to graduate from a ranting leader with vengeance as his campaign message to a statesmen politician with radical policies aimed at transforming the country. His presidential ambitions seemed to be motivated more by anger than alternative polices.
On many occasions Besigye sunk too low that he normally had spats with police officers and took the confrontations personal by warning them of the consequences of apprehending him.   Yet these are the men and women he needed to work with when he became president.  
With time Ugandans got tired of the Besigye brand.   


Ugandans with some degree of rational thinking who had genuine disagreements with president Museveni and would have wished to join the opposition were put off by Kiiza Besigye’s irrational political rantings.
Many of them simply skipped voting-which explains why there was massive voter apathy.
Most of the anti-Museveni Ugandans but who were disgusted with the Besigye brand thought that his last defeat in the 2011 elections was his last attempt at the presidency.
And it was with a sigh of relief that he later announced that he wouldn’t contest again, by stepping down and allowing a more rational and well composed Rtd Mugish Muntu to emerge.
But this week KB threw a spanner in the wheels by picking the nomination forms with intentions of running again.
But what message does he poses?
How will he fare in an environment where the rented support has already been eroded by the emergence of new political players?
The Liberation Syndrome
Besigye’s problem stems from the misguided belief (shared by many unschooled individuals) that someone cannot emerge as leader of an African country without practically sacrificing either by enduring tear gas and jail or practically fighting a war. It’s fair to say that Besigye suffers from a liberation syndrome.
This notion is derived from the suffering which many pre-colonial African leaders suffered at the hands of the colonialists. Some of them endured long jail terms like South African iconic leader the late Nelson Mandela (who was incarcerated for 27 years) and Jomo Kenyatta who also spent many years in prison.
It so happens that the likes of Besigye were infected with this brand of politics which explains why he enjoys confrontations with the police. Yet the times have changed from that type of politics to issue-based political agitations.
Today, world politics has graduated from liberation politics to politics of articulating alternative polices. Today leaders are judged by their views on climate change, economic models, emigration policies, social policy etc.

You find that while Kenyan founding President Jomo Kenyatta suffered jail to become president of Kenya, his son Uhuru Kenyatta simply had to convince Kenyans to become president.
Likewise, while Nelson Mandela had to lose 27 years of his freedom in prison, his predecessors, Thabo Mbeki, Jacob Zuma simply had to reason their way to the south African presidency.
Therefore Besigye’S obsession with the Kenyatta-Mandela politics simply make him an odd-man out in the 2016 presidential contest and he should live by his earlier decision to retire and probably give guidance to the likes of Gen Mugisha Muntu to take FDC forward.
Ends 

The author Fred Daka Kamwada is a senior journalist and blogger; reach him on kamwadafred@yahoo.com




Wednesday, 1 July 2015

How The Selfish Principle Of ‘Each One For Himself And God For Us All’ Has Caught Up With The Old NRM Cadres



How The Selfish Principle Of ‘Each One For Himself And God For Us All’ Has Caught Up With The Old NRM Cadres 




  •  The Old NRM Cadres Made No Friends To Forge a Power-base
  • NRM Should Emulate UPC\\s NUSU Which Mentored Young Leaders To Emerge

When President Yoweri Museveni shot to power with his National Resistance Army some 30 years ago, the political wing of his group, the National Resistance Movement comprised of elderly Ugandan politicians who had spent many years in exile.
This group was led by the late former vice president Dr Samson Kiseka and had a membership of the likes of Paul Wapakabulo, Sam Njuba , Eriya Kategaya , Bidandi Ssali, Amanya Mushega , Kahinda Ottafire and many others.
With Dr Samson Kiseeka in his 80s, the average age of these senior NRM members who later formed the National Resistance Council was estimated to be around 55 years.
On the other hand, the armed wing, the NRA comprised of very young cadres to the extent that some of them who later rose to become army commanders like Gen Salim Saleh and Gen Mugish Muntu were just 26 year of age.
There was another much younger group that comprised of the late Brig Noble Mayombo , Brig Moses Rwakitarate, Brig James Mugiira and some others who were less than 22 years at the time of the grand takeover in 1986.

Yoweri Museveni who was the overall leader of the group and led both the armed and political wing of the movement was about 44 years.  
While the NRM group catered for the politics, the armed wing (NRA)continued to liberate the country by fighting insurgencies across the country.
President Museveni was in the privileged position of interacting with both the political and the armed wing of the movement.
It was therefore easy for Museveni to conduct the business of managing these groups very well because he fitted in both generations, since he was neither too old nor too young to lead the movement at age 44.
Therefore the generational battles were never an issue in the earlier stages of the NRM administration.
To Groom Of Not To Groom
Because of the nature of the challenges at play, the armed combatants managed to recruit many Ugandans into the National Resistance Army.
 The soldiers were not selfish in propping up their colleagues for promotion and access to bigger positions.
For instance the late Gen James Kazini rose through the ranks to become major general and army commander respectively despite of the fact that he had been a mere ADC to Gen Salim Saleh at the time of the takeover.

Brigadier Noble Mayombo And Mugish Muntu also rose to higher positions of influence in the army despite of their younger age.
It’s believed that every senior army officer recruited loyalists around him.
 People like Brig Henry Tumukunde recruited so many people within the army and intelligence services to an extent at some stage the state got worried that he had the capacity to cause trouble!.  That’s why brig Tumukunde managed to easily deal with the terror threats in Kampala.
Gen kazini also had a big section of loyalists within the army that believed in him to the extent that at one he was even court marshaled for trying stage a coup! He too managed to accomplish his assignments in Congo and wherever he was deployed.
It seemed as though the army was the best breeding ground for young people.
Youth Wing Suppressed
But while the army allowed younger people to emerge and take up positions of responsibility, the members of the political wing deliberately suffocated young people from emerging.
People like Bidandi Ssali, the late Eriya kategaya, Sam Njuba, Paul Wapakabulo , Amanya Mushega , Kahinda Ottafire, Amama Mbabazi  worked in government for very many years but had no loyalists because they had not recruited or groomed people for the party.
In fact there are reports that these senior NRM gurus deliberately refused to institute the youth wing of the NRM party just to make sure that no young people emerge to challenge them.
The never reached out to young people in schools and tertiary institutions the way president Milton Obote had done by grooming young people in an association known as the National Union For Ugandan Students (NUSU)
Obote managed to groom the likes of current prime minister Ruhakana Rugunda , current national bank governor Tumusime Mutebile , and many others through NUSU. 

But the NRM refused to do the same thing of cropping up young people mostly due to selfish reasons.  
That’s why you see a rag-tag and almost nonexistent youth wing of the NRM party at the moment because the NRM elders never approved of its existence.
Due to either selfishness or lack of foresight, they made sure that they worked with a very small clique of people which left them without a power base to cling on at a time of need.
Selfishness Reloaded
The same selfish trait has now caught up with the new group of NRM members like former vice president Prof Gilbert Bukenya who also held very powerful positions but never built a circle of loyalists around him.
By the time Prof Gilbert Bukenya was sacked, he almost had no friends to lean on to rave-up his presidential ambitions because he had no bothered to court people around him.
On the other hand when Amama was kicked out of government the only friend he had was a one Adam Luzindana and a few young boys.

Can you imagine that?
Yet due to the senior positions of government he held, a man like Amama Mbabazi was expected to defect with half of the government officials. But he seems to have non at the moment because he never built a power base of friends when he had to the time to do so.
And you can obviously see that he must be regretting why he never made enough friends when he still had the power and political muscle to do so.
Today the selfishness of these old cadres has caught up with them as they have no one to run to.
They have no power base because they suppressed new blood from emerging from the ranks.
CLASH OF GENERATIONS
In fact the recent happenings in the NRM in the last three years have been contests between the youthful members of NRM against the old guard.  The young Turks have had to literally ‘fight off’ the old guard for operating space within the party in what you can call a clash of generations.
Of course president Museveni is once again privileged to be the center of reference and has been flexible enough to allow the young Turks to take over the party.
It’s widely believed that the NRM party has been renting office space at kyadondo road for the last thirty years because of the tight fisted and selfish nature of the old cadres.
 But with the emergence of the young and focused Turks who are not selfish, the party has already managed to fundraise Shs 16bn, mostly for the construction of the proposed NRM house.
The young Turks have already networked support and membership across the country.
And it’s practically obvious that these young people will make it easier for president Museveni to win the 2016 elections.
Conclusion
With this realization in mind, the NRM should revitalize the youth wing in the same mould as UPC’s NUSU to allow continuity and grooming ground for vibrant cadres of the party.
Otherwise experience has taught us that the maxim of the old NRM cadres; ‘’Of Each One for Himself and God for Us All’’ is practically counterproductive. 
Ends



 The author Fred Daka Kamwada is a senior journalist and blogger; you can reach him on kamwadafred@yahoo.com